PALAIOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PALAIOS; February 1998; v. 13; no. 1; p. 52-69
© 1998 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radenbaugh, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by McKinney, F. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Comparison of the structure of a Mississippian and a Holocene pen shell assemblage

Todd A. Radenbaugh, and Frank K. McKinney

Appalachian State University, Department of Geology, Boone, NC, United States

Benthic assemblages associated with pen shells (Pelecypoda: Pinnidae) in a Holocene back-barrier marine environment and in an exposure of Mississippian rocks that are inferred to be back-barrier marine deposits, appear to have more structural similarities than differences, despite their separation by over 300 million years and dominance by organisms that are not closely related taxonomically. Both of the studied assemblages occur in fine-grained, calcareous siliciclastic deposits. Excluding the pen shells, each assemblage is dominated by three species, all of which are epibenthic suspension feeders in the Mississippian association, while two of the three are epibenthic suspension feeders in the Holocene association. However, the Mississippian dominants are free-lying or byssally attached, while one of the two epibenthic dominants in the Holocene association is cemented (Crassostrea) and the other is an intermittent swimmer (Aequipecten). The Holocene assemblage has a substantially higher proportion of shallow burrowers than did the Mississippian assemblage, which may be a contributing cause of the differences in life habits of the dominant species, inasmuch as mobile and cemented epibenthic organisms are less likely to be disturbed by churning of surficial sediment by shallow burrowers than are free-lying organisms. Within the Holocene study site, pen shells are found only in marine grass beds. The Mississippian pen shells are associated with a conspicuously increased abundance of erect bryozoan fragments and also with a higher species richness than associated beds within the measured stratigraphic section. It is inferred that the erect bryozoans baffled currents, thereby reducing flow velocity and increasing the availability of microenvironments, in much the same way as modern sea-grass patches that contain pen shells.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
P. M. Novack-Gottshall
Using a theoretical ecospace to quantify the ecological diversity of Paleozoic and modern marine biotas
Paleobiology, March 1, 2007; 33(2): 273 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
Preservation Potential and Paleoecological Significance of Epibenthic Suspension Feeder-Dominated Benthic Communities (Northern Adriatic Sea)
Palaios, February 1, 2003; 18(1): 47 - 62.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.