PALAIOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PALAIOS; December 2000; v. 15; no. 6; p. 499-510; DOI: 10.1669/0883-1351(2000)015<0499:TIOBHI>2.0.CO;2
© 2000 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAPLAN, P.
Right arrow Articles by BAUMILLER, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Taphonomic Inferences on Boring Habit in the Richmondian Onniella meeki Epibole

PETER KAPLAN1 and TOMASZ K. BAUMILLER1

1 University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Shell boring is one of the few quantifiable, well-preserved biotic interactions in the fossil record. While some workers have used boring intensity as a proxy for predation pressure in both Recent and fossil assemblages, others have warned that taphonomic and other effects can alter the boring intensity and lead to paleoecological misinterpretation. When the biocoenosis is known, however, taphonomic effects can be "undone" a posteriori. Because the valve ratio of any bivalved organism must be 1:1 in the biocoenosis, strengths of between-valve taphonomic biases can be calculated directly for any disarticulated assemblage of bivalved fossils. By back-calculating the biocoenotic boring intensities, improved estimates of boring stereotypy may be obtained. These "restored" boring intensities can provide more accurate paleoecological interpretations of boring habit while remaining numerically conservative.

Taphonomic analysis of a bored Ordovician brachiopod assemblage shows that (1) the assemblage had experienced negligible differential transport; and (2) convex (pedicle) valves have been preferentially crushed in place. Comparing the taphonomy of the assemblage to a set of laboratory taphonomic regimes reveals that valve-valve contact may be of great consequence in skeletal taphonomy. In particular, valve-valve contacts appear to promote (1) preferential destruction of convex valves; and (2) subequal destruction of bored vs. unbored valves. Taking into account these taphonomic effects, numerous hypotheses of boring habit—including mixed-motive boring—have been tested using a probabilistic model. The model herein presented indicates a likely contribution of 10–15% predatory boring in the assemblage. The usefulness of probabilistic models for providing simultaneous, realistic tests of multiple hypotheses is emphasized.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
M. Grey, E. G. Boulding, and M. E. Brookfield
Estimating multivariate selection gradients in the fossil record: a naticid gastropod case study
Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
Borings in Cloudina Shells: Complex Predator-Prey Dynamics in the Terminal Neoproterozoic
Palaios, October 1, 2003; 18(4-5): 454 - 459.



Home page
PALAIOSHome page
Domiciles, Not Predatory Borings: A Simpler Explanation of the Holes in Ordovician Shells Analyzed by Kaplan and Baumiller, 2000
Palaios, October 1, 2001; 16(5): 524 - 525.



Home page
PALAIOSHome page
A Misuse of Occam's Razor That Trims More Than Just the Fat
Palaios, October 1, 2001; 16(5): 525 - 527.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.