|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Geology, 114 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, geojbb{at}hofstra.edu
Estimates of species abundance used to quantitatively describe paleocommunities are more precise and more reliable when sampling effort is distributed among many small replicate samples, rather than concentrated in the collecting of one or a few large samples. This is because sampling error is introduced by the patchy distribution of individuals within a fossil deposit. This study applies a dispersed sampling protocol to compare the fossil assemblages preserved within a marine shell bed at two different localities of the Upper Cretaceous Navesink Formation in east-central New Jersey. A spatial hierarchy of small bulk samples (replicate samples collected along an outcrop, samples from different outcrops within a locality, and samples collected from two different localities) reveals the magnitude and scale of patchiness in the distribution of macrofauna in the Navesink shell bed. Species abundance is highly variable between replicate samples and moderately variable between outcrops due to small scale patchiness. Nevertheless, estimates of species abundance generated by collecting across the patches at each locality reveal that the overall species abundance distribution for the Navesink shell bed is nearly identical between the two localities. When collecting effort is dispersed among many widely distributed samples, different patches of fossil remains are sampled and contribute to the overall estimate of average composition obtained for a locality. Comparisons of fossil assemblages between localities or horizons are rendered more reliable by decreasing the probability that compositionally different patches have been sampled within otherwise identical paleocommunities. The significance of differences detected between local paleocommunities can be assessed more confidently when replicate samples provide a measure of local variability arising from patchiness. Paleontologists sampling to describe the species abundance composition of a discrete region of a stratigraphic horizon (e.g., outcrop, locality) should define the spatial scale of the region they are describing and disperse their sampling effort within that region.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Bonelli Jr. and M. E. Patzkowsky How Are Global Patterns Of Faunal Turnover Expressed At Regional Scales? Evidence From the Upper Mississippian (Chesterian Series), Illinois Basin, USA Palaios, November 1, 2008; 23(11): 760 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Zambito IV, C. E. Mitchell, and H. D. Sheets A Comparison of Sampling and Statistical Techniques for Analyzing Bulk-sampled Biofacies Composition Palaios, May 1, 2008; 23(5): 313 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Finnegan and M. L. Droser Reworking Diversity: Effects Of Storm Deposition On Evenness And Sampled Richness, Ordovician Of The Basin And Range, Utah And Nevada, Usa Palaios, February 1, 2008; 23(2): 87 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. REDMAN, L. R. LEIGHTON, S. A. SCHELLENBERG, C. N. GALE, J. L. NIELSEN, D. L. DRESSLER, and M. K. KLINGER INFLUENCE OF SPATIOTEMPORAL SCALE ON THE INTERPRETATION OF PALEOCOMMUNITY STRUCTURE: LATERAL VARIATION IN THE IMPERIAL FORMATION OF CALIFORNIA Palaios, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 630 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. BRETT, A. J. BARTHOLOMEW, and G. C. BAIRD BIOFACIES RECURRENCE IN THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN OF NEW YORK STATE: AN EXAMPLE WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR EVOLUTIONARY PALEOECOLOGY Palaios, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 306 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Theiling, L. B. Railsback, S. M. Holland, and D. E. Crowe Heterogeneity in Geochemical Expression of Subaerial Exposure in Limestones, and Its Implications for Sampling to Detect Exposure Surfaces Journal of Sedimentary Research, February 1, 2007; 77(2): 159 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Olszewski and S. M. Kidwell The preservational fidelity of evenness in molluscan death assemblages Paleobiology, January 1, 2007; 33(1): 1 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. CLAPHAM, D. J. BOTTJER, C. M. POWERS, N. BONUSO, M. L. FRAISER, P. J. MARENCO, S. Q. DORNBOS, and S. B. PRUSS ASSESSING THE ECOLOGICAL DOMINANCE OF PHANEROZOIC MARINE INVERTEBRATES Palaios, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 431 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Bonelli Jr., C. E. Brett, A. I. Miller, and J B. Bennington Testing for faunal stability across a regional biotic transition: quantifying stasis and variation among recurring coral-rich biofacies in the Middle Devonian Appalachian Basin Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 20 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. HOLLAND The Signatures of Patches and Gradients in Ecological Ordinations Palaios, December 1, 2005; 20(6): 573 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. ZUSCHIN, M. HARZHAUSER, and O. MANDIC Influence of Size-sorting on Diversity Estimates from Tempestitic Shell Beds in the Middle Miocene of Austria Palaios, April 1, 2005; 20(2): 142 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Effects of Spatial Patchiness on the Stratigraphic Signal of Biotic Composition (Type Cincinnatian Series; Upper Ordovician) Palaios, February 1, 2005; 20(1): 37 - 50. |
||||
![]() |
Evenness of Cambrian-Ordovician benthic marine communities in North America Paleobiology, September 1, 2004; 30(3): 325 - 346. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |