PALAIOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PALAIOS; December 2006; v. 21; no. 6; p. 580-587; DOI: 10.2110/palo.2005.p05-025r
© 2006 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PETERS, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

RESEARCH NOTES

GENUS RICHNESS IN CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN BENTHIC MARINE COMMUNITIES IN NORTH AMERICA

SHANAN E. PETERS1

1 Department of Geological Sciences and Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Rd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA shananp{at}umich.edu

The causes of global biological diversification and the nature of ecological change during taxonomic radiations are central questions in paleobiology. It has long been recognized, however, that apparent increases in global taxonomic richness need not be mirrored in local communities. Here, using field data and literature sources from Laurentia, it is shown that genus richness in well-preserved subtidal macrobenthic marine communities increased by as much as a factor of two from the Middle Cambrian to the Late Ordovician. Several potential sources of bias have been addressed in this study, including taphonomic effects, water depth, lithology, sample size, and differences in the relative numerical abundance of taxa (evenness). Excluding samples from environments that may have been oxygen stressed and omitting samples that closely follow Cambrian biomere extinction intervals result in much less complete temporal sampling and significantly influence apparent short-term patterns of biodiversity, but do not change fundamentally the overall richness and evenness trajectories. The apparent magnitude and timing of the increases in local richness and evenness, however, is sensitive to such factors. The overall richness trajectory is also sensitive to how evenness is treated quantitatively. If evenness is assumed to represent a biological positive correlate of richness, then rarefaction is most appropriate and suggests an Early Ordovician richness increase. If evenness is treated strictly as a bias in richness estimates, then most of the richness increase appears to have occurred by the late Cambrian (Marjuman), with only a modest increase after the Arenigian.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
P. G. Harnik
Unveiling rare diversity by integrating museum, literature, and field data
Paleobiology, March 1, 2009; 35(2): 190 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
S. Finnegan, J. L. Payne, and S. C. Wang
The Red Queen revisited: reevaluating the age selectivity of Phanerozoic marine genus extinctions
Paleobiology, September 1, 2008; 34(3): 318 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
S. Finnegan and M. L. Droser
Body size, energetics, and the Ordovician restructuring of marine ecosystems
Paleobiology, September 1, 2008; 34(3): 342 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.